This is super cool - I've won an auction! A
1970s Seiko pocket watch write-off for just $13. Judging by the photos,
most likely, the poor thing went through a washing machine. Externally, a
disaster. Internally - just a blob of rusty mud.
So why am I so excited? Because I have in stock every single part for
this particular Seiko calibre, and like the Ship of Theseus, I can
already see this railway pocket watch looking like new, and keeping
perfect time. The whole restoration project shot in 4K would generate
hundreds of thousands of views and steady advertising income for years
to come.
There is only one problem: I don't really have time to do it right now...
By the way, and if you are not familiar with the concept: the Ship of
Theseus is a thought experiment that raises the question of whether an
object that has had all of its components replaced over time remains
fundamentally the same object. This concept is one of the oldest in
Western philosophy, having been discussed by Heraclitus and Plato 2500
years ago. Since then, philosophers have been banging their heads to
solve this paradox, which in a way remains unresolved to this day.
Yet in my mind, the paradox could be easily solved in a very elegant
way, by introducing the 'third party' with vested interests. Suppose
that the watch was insured for a sum of let's say $1000. Then ruined by a
careless owner, then restored by a skilful watchmaker who replaced
every single part at the total cost of $1,000. The owner makes a claim
to their insurance company who happily pays the watchmaker.
Here is the punch line: while both the watch owner and watchmaker could
agree that the newly 'recreated watch' may not be the original watch,
such a dilemma would not burden the insurer. The insurer doesn't really
care; because it is not his job to care about thought experiments, but
material evidence.
In other words, the paradox exists only if we want it to exist. And even then, it only exists in our minds. | |
No comments:
Post a Comment